....Big Brother Tries to Muscle ISPs


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January
2003 December
2003 November
2003 October
2003 September
2003 August
2003 July

My Links
STOP TCPA!!!!

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


"Those who are willing to give up freedom for a little safety deserve neither freedom nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." Theodore Roosevelt

digg links, for the techie:


....Big Brother Tries to Muscle ISPs
05.31.05 (2:34 pm)   [edit]

 


 


WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration asked a federal appeals court Friday to restore its ability to compel Internet service providers to turn over information about their customers or subscribers as part of its fight against terrorism.


The legal filing with the 2nd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in New York comes amid a debate in Congress over renewal of the Patriot Act and whether to expand the FBI's power to seek records without the approval of a judge or grand jury.


U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero of New York last year blocked the government from conducting secret searches of communications records, saying the law that authorized them wrongly barred legal challenges and imposed a gag order on affected businesses.


The ruling came in a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union and an internet access firm that received a national security letter from the FBI demanding records. The identity of the firm remains secret.


The government was authorized to pursue communications records as part of a 1986 law. Its powers were enhanced by the Patriot Act in 2001.


The administration said the judge's ruling was off the mark because the company did mount a legal challenge to the demand for records. "Yet in this very case, the recipient of the national security letter did precisely what the NSLs supposedly prevent recipients from doing," the filing said.


The law's ban on disclosing that such a letter has been received also is appropriate because of legitimate security concerns, the government said.


But ACLU attorney Jameel Jaffer said the law does not contain a provision to challenge the FBI's demand for documents. The ACLU and the firm filed the lawsuit to challenge the law's constitutionality on the grounds that it doesn't contain such a provision, he said.


"Most people who get NSLs don't know they can bring a challenge in court because the statute doesn't say they can," he said. "No one has filed a motion to quash in 20 years."


The ban on disclosure is so broad that the ACLU initially filed the suit under seal and negotiated for weeks on a version that could be released to the public.


Previously censored material released several months after Marrero's ruling included innocuous material the government wanted withheld, the ACLU said, including the phrase "national security" and this sentence from a statement by an FBI agent: "I am a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation."


From Wired News (http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0" title="http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0" target="_blank"http://www.wired.com/news/pri...,1848,67674,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_7)

 
Your Name:


Your Comment:


QUOTE: Stupidity has a bad habit of getting its way. --"The Day After"

QUOTE: Because I do it with one small ship, I am called a terrorist. You do it with a whole fleet and are called an emperor. – A pirate, from St. Augustine's "City of God"

QUOTE: War: A wretched debasement of all the pretenses of civilization. – General Omar Bradley

I hope....that mankind will at length, as they call themselves responsible creatures, have the reason and sense enough to settle their differences without cutting throats... – Benjamin Franklin

"There must be security for all, or no one is secure. Now this does not mean giving up any freedom, except the freedom to act irresponsibly."-- Klaatu, The Day The Earth Stood Still, 1951.

Listed on Blogwise