Jesus Freaks Me Out


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January
2003 December
2003 November
2003 October
2003 September
2003 August
2003 July

My Links
STOP TCPA!!!!

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


"Those who are willing to give up freedom for a little safety deserve neither freedom nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." Theodore Roosevelt

digg links, for the techie:


...and here I thought CNN had the dumbest journalists
07.07.05 (12:14 pm)   [edit]

 


 


...hahaha...


Fox News' Brian Kilmeade: London terror attack near G8 summit "works to ... Western world's advantage, for people to experience something like this together"


The following exchange between Fox News host Brian Kilmeade and Fox News business contributor and substitute host Stuart Varney occurred during breaking news coverage of the attacks on London subways and buses on the July 7 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:



KILMEADE: And he [British Prime Minister Tony Blair] made the statement, clearly shaken, but clearly determined. This is his second address in the last hour. First to the people of London, and now at the G8 summit, where their topic Number 1 --believe it or not-- was global warming, the second was African aid. And that was the first time since 9-11 when they should know, and they do know now, that terrorism should be Number 1. But it's important for them all to be together. I think that works to our advantage, in the Western world's advantage, for people to experience something like this together, just 500 miles from where the attacks have happened.


VARNEY: It puts the Number 1 issue right back on the front burner right at the point where all these world leaders are meeting. It takes global warming off the front burner. It takes African aid off the front burner. It sticks terrorism and the fight on the war on terror, right up front all over again.


KILMEADE: Yeah.


 

 
....Raising the Retirement Age for Social Security
07.05.05 (3:56 pm)   [edit]

 


 


As the debate over Social Security privatization continues in the media and the U.S. Congress, raising the retirement age has once again received fresh attention. Certainly today, people generally live longer than in the past and thus rely on Social Security benefits for longer. Proponents of raising the Social Security retirement age argue that workers should work longer before becoming eligible for full Social Security benefits.


Social Security is a form of retirement savings for individuals, but the savings aspect of the program has always been combined with a significant social insurance role. Social Security also protects from poverty those workers who can no longer work due to age or disability. While some workers are able to rely on other forms of retirement income, for many, Social Security is the primary or only income source in retirement. Evidence reviewed in this paper suggests that a higher retirement age could disproportionately affect those people who already depend the most on Social Security for retirement income, e.g. lower income workers, minorities and women. These workers tend to be in worse health than their counterparts at older ages, tend to have lower life expectancies and tend to have less retirement wealth outside of Social Security. Specifically, the data suggests:




  • Longevity and health status at or near the current retirement age are two separate issues. Specifically, while gains in life expectancy have accelerated, health improvements for those near the current retirement age appear to have slowed.


  • While the majority of older workers are in good health at or near the current retirement age, there is a substantial minority who are not. Moreover, women, minorities, blue collar, and lower wage workers tend to be in worse health than their counterparts.


  • Working longer before receiving full Social Security benefits is a benefit cut that would impact African-Americans, blue collar workers, and low income workers more than their counterparts.


  • It is also important to consider whether employers are willing to hire more older workers when the retirement age is raised. Labor market trends do not necessarily support the view that there is a hiring boom for older workers.


  • Groups that would be disproportionately affected by a higher retirement age tend to have lower retirement savings outside of Social Security than their counterparts.

The popular discussion of proposals to raise the retirement age tends to rely almost exclusively on the growing (median) longevity of the population and give far too little consideration to the distributional implications of the proposal. Nor does the current discussion sufficiently consider the implications for the social insurance aspects of the Social Security program. Thoughtful reform will address all of these issues.


Entire Report: http://www.americanprogress.org/atf/cf/" title="http://www.americanprogress.org/atf/cf/" target="_blank"http://www.americanprogress.o...{E9245FE4-9A2B-43C7-A521- 5D6FF2E06E03}/retirement_ age.pdf 

 
....Sandra Day O'Connor leaving Supreme Court
07.01.05 (5:54 am)   [edit]

 


Friday, July 1, 2005; Posted: 11:11 a.m. EDT (15:11 GMT)


WASHINGTON (AP) -- Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the first woman appointed to the Supreme Court and a key swing vote on issues such as abortion and the death penalty, said Friday she is retiring.


O'Connor, 75, said she expects to leave before the start of the court's next term in October, or whenever the Senate confirms her successor. There was no immediate word from the White House on who might be nominated to replace O'Connor.


It's been 11 years since the last opening on the court, one of the longest uninterrupted stretches in history. O'Connor's decision gives President Bush his first opportunity to appoint a justice.


"This is to inform you of my decision to retire from my position as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, effective upon the nomination and confirmation of my successor," she said in a one-paragraph letter to Bush.


Bush planned to make a statement at 11:15 a.m. ET in the White House Rose Garden on her resignation. Spokesman Scott McClellan said Bush would not be announcing a nominee to succeed her.


O'Connor's retirement came amid speculation that the aging court would soon have a vacancy. But speculation has most recently focused on Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, 80, and suffering from thyroid cancer. Rehnquist has offered no public clue as to his plans.


The White House has refused to comment on any possible nominees, or whether Bush would name a woman to succeed O'Connor. Her departure leaves Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg as the only other woman among the current justices.


Possible replacements include Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales and federal courts of appeals judges J. Michael Luttig, John Roberts, Samuel A. Alito Jr., Michael McConnell, Emilio Garza and James Harvie Wilkinson III. Others mentioned are former Solicitor General Theodore Olson, lawyer Miguel Estrada and former deputy attorney general Larry Thompson, but Bush's pick could be a surprise choice not well known in legal circles.


Another prospective candidate is Edith Hollan Jones, a judge on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals who was also considered for a Supreme Court vacancy by President Bush's father.


O'Connor's appointment in 1981 by President Ronald Reagan, quickly confirmed by the Senate, ended 191 years of male exclusivity on the high court.


She wasted little time building a reputation as a hard-working moderate conservative who emerged as a crucial power broker on the nine-member court.


O'Connor often lines up with the court's conservative bloc, as she did in 2000 when the court voted to stop Florida presidential ballot recounts sought by Al Gore, and effectively called the election for Bush.


As a "swing voter," however, O'Connor sometimes votes with more liberal colleagues.


Perhaps the best example of her influence is the court's evolving stance on abortion. She distanced herself both from her three most conservative colleagues, who say there is no constitutional underpinning for a right to abortion, and from more liberal justices for whom the right is a given.


O'Connor initially balked at letting states outlaw most abortions, refusing in 1989 to join four other justices who were ready to reverse the landmark 1973 decision that said women have a constitutional right to abortion.


Then in 1992, she helped forge and lead a five-justice majority that reaffirmed the core holding of the 1973 ruling. Subsequent appointments secured the abortion right. Commentators called O'Connor the nation's most powerful woman, but O'Connor poo-poohed the thought.


"I don't think it's accurate," she said in an Associated Press interview.


Appointment reactions


O'Connor in late 1988 was diagnosed as having breast cancer, and she underwent a mastectomy. She missed just two weeks of work. That same year, she had her appendix removed.


For years, O'Connor had an involuntary nodding of her head, but said she never had it diagnosed. The movement, while not constant, was an up-and-down motion similar to that made by someone nodding in the affirmative.


O'Connor remained the court's only woman until 1993 when, much to O'Connor's delight and relief, President Bill Clinton appointed Ginsburg.


The enormity of the reaction to O'Connor's appointment had surprised her. She received more than 60,000 letters in her first year, more than any one member in the court's history.


"I had no idea when I was appointed how much it would mean to many people around the country," she once said. "It affected them in a very personal way. People saw it as a signal that there are virtually unlimited opportunities for women. It's important to parents for their daughters, and to daughters for themselves."


At times, the constant publicity was almost unbearable. "I had never expected or aspired to be a Supreme Court justice. My first year on the court made me long at times for obscurity," she once said.


Pivotal opinions


On the court, O'Connor generally favored states in disputes with the federal government and for enhanced police powers challenged as violative of asserted individual rights.


In 1985, she wrote for the court as it ruled that the confession of a criminal suspect first warned about his rights may be used as trial evidence even if police violated a suspect's rights in obtaining an earlier confession.


O'Connor wrote the 1989 decision that struck down as an unconstitutional form of affirmative action a minority set-aside program for construction projects in Richmond, Virginia.


In 1991, she led the court as it ruled in its first-ever decision on rape-shield laws that states may under some circumstances bar evidence that a defendant and his alleged victim previously had consensual sex.


O'Connor once described herself and her eight fellow justices as nine firefighters.


"When (someone) lights a fire, we invariably are asked to attend to the blaze. We may arrive at the scene a few years later," she said.


O'Connor was 51 when she joined the court to replace the retired Potter Stewart. A virtual unknown on the national scene until her appointment, she had served as an Arizona state judge, and before that as a member of her state's Legislature.


Southwestern roots


A fourth-generation Arizonan, she had grown up on a sprawling family ranch.


The woman who climbed higher in the legal profession than had any other member of her sex did not begin her career auspiciously. As a top-ranked graduate of Stanford's prestigious law school, class of 1952, O'Connor discovered that most large law firms did not hire women.


One offered her a job as a secretary. Perhaps it was that early experience that shaped O'Connor's professional tenacity. She once recalled a comment by an Arizona colleague: "With Sandra O'Connor, there ain't no Miller time."


"I think that's true," confessed the justice whose work week most often extended beyond 60 hours.


But she played tennis and golf well, danced expertly with her husband, John, and made frequent appearances on the Washington party circuit.


O'Connor was embarrassed in 1989 after conservative Republicans in Arizona used a letter she had sent to support their claim that the United States is a "Christian nation."


The 1988 letter, which prompted some harsh criticism of O'Connor by legal scholars, cited three Supreme Court rulings in which the nation's Christian heritage was discussed.


O'Connor said she regretted the letter's use in a political debate. "It was not my intention to express a personal view on the subject of the inquiry," she said.


O'Connor's name was linked in 1985 with that of Washington Redskins football star John Riggins when at a formal dinner he was heard to tell the justice sharing his table, "Loosen up, Sandy baby."


Shortly thereafter, the women who participated with O'Connor at an 8 a.m. daily exercise class presented her with a tee-shirt that proclaimed: "Loosen up at the Supreme Court."


The O'Connors have three sons, Scott, Brian and Jay.

 
QUOTE: Stupidity has a bad habit of getting its way. --"The Day After"

QUOTE: Because I do it with one small ship, I am called a terrorist. You do it with a whole fleet and are called an emperor. – A pirate, from St. Augustine's "City of God"

QUOTE: War: A wretched debasement of all the pretenses of civilization. – General Omar Bradley

I hope....that mankind will at length, as they call themselves responsible creatures, have the reason and sense enough to settle their differences without cutting throats... – Benjamin Franklin

"There must be security for all, or no one is secure. Now this does not mean giving up any freedom, except the freedom to act irresponsibly."-- Klaatu, The Day The Earth Stood Still, 1951.

Listed on Blogwise